| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 85 |
| | Posted: | | | | In reports with multiple DVDs per page, the sort direction is by column. It' would be better to sort by row.
Example:
Today Wish
1 4 7 1 2 3
2 5 8 4 5 6
3 6 9 7 8 9 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,759 |
| | Posted: | | | | It is not better either way. The logical solution would be an option. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 1,118 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yes, please! People have been asking for this feature for years.
Sorting by row would follow how we read documents around here. |
|
| Registered: November 6, 2007 | | Posts: 2 |
| |
| Registered: September 19, 2007 | | Posts: 3 |
| | Posted: | | | | I agree completly, just found another topic with this same request.
invelos, you need to add this as a feature in the software. |
|
| Registered: March 16, 2007 | | Posts: 17 |
| | Posted: | | | | bumping this thread up also as it seems like such an over-sight not to give people this option, when you consider the thousands of other things DVDprofiler can do. Heck.. you can even make it a feature of the paid for subscribers only. |
|
| Registered: January 22, 2008 | | Posts: 48 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'll jump on this Band Wagon. I totally agree that left to right would be better than top to bottom but only when using cover images. Text works good with columns. So having the option to format the report either way would be perfect! |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Agreed with RHo. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting JimmyT: Quote:
I'll jump on this Band Wagon. I totally agree that left to right would be better than top to bottom but only when using cover images. Text works good with columns. So having the option to format the report either way would be perfect! This request has been made for years, at the time of intervocative. Unfortunately, Ken never decided to implement it. I also hope he will do in a next release. | | | | Images from movies |
|
| Registered: July 20, 2007 | | Posts: 1 |
| | Posted: | | | | Yes PLEASE! I cannot believe this has not been implemented yet. I purchased this product and love it but this is one of my MAJOR gripes with it. Seems so simple... fix it please... |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 5,494 |
| | Posted: | | | | which report header?? | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 10 |
| | Posted: | | | | Accidently I just saw (klicking on edit report), that this request has been finally implemented. Great! Didn´t get since when ... so what  Thanks a lot...   | | | __________________________________________________________________________
the last 120 new acquisitions |
|
| Registered: September 7, 2008 |  Posts: 2 |
| | Posted: | | | | It's there now, but it's buggy: I keep getting images fall of the edge of pages if I sort by rows... |
|
| Registered: March 7, 2009 | | Posts: 1 |
| | Posted: | | | | I tried too to use this sort, but the top margin is bugged. Its useless at the moment.
Please, the vertical sort is incredibely painful. |
|
| Registered: June 9, 2007 | | Posts: 3 |
| | Posted: | | | | You can fix this so that it will work correctly. Go to edit reports, then to margins and change the top margin to 1.5. The reports will then print correctly. It leaves a space at the bottom but it isn't too big.Hope this helps. |
|
| Registered: April 16, 2008 |  Posts: 347 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting luckychucky: Quote:
You can fix this so that it will work correctly. Go to edit reports, then to margins and change the top margin to 1.5. The reports will then print correctly. It leaves a space at the bottom but it isn't too big.Hope this helps. Hi, It didn't work for me. Jim |
|