|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
They 're building better and better Bluray players these days .. |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | I wrote a couple years back complaining about the software to up and run an HDD player or Blu ray player.. Too slow to start up.. & never being able to stop and replay a disc without it going back to square one again( chapter one),, major frustration.. Well imagine my recent surprise on my fourth purchase in the past 5 years of yet another High DEF dvd player ( LG Blueray BP200 model with wifi under $80.. ) One.- it starts up and hit the menu within about 25 seconds ,.. Two- then if playing a BD disc I can hit stop and eject and the player (when tray is enclosed again) finds the ''exact spot'' within seconds of that disc playback part two.. Why didn't someone else report this or was it not terribly important to you.. I also like the extra menu over my previous player YouTube.. I can set it up with my own ID and the channel will playback all my personal videos and favorites from my Youtube login.. all in 16x9 if present.. I knew that first $400 player I first bought was crap.. compared to today's high efficient (and cheap) models.. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry | | | Last edited: by widescreenforever |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Never had any trouble with my Oppo (2009 model) but it wasn't cheap. My first BD-player (a 2007 Samsung) fired up in 12 seconds blank but that was a profile 1.0 player, meaning no Java. Of course nothing beat my old Toshiba XE1 HD DVD.player. Except that HD DVD lost the format war... | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | What do you call "better"?
With many of these plastic cheap players you have to be lucky to get more than a year's lifetime before they break down. In terms of build quality, I wouldn't state they're building "better and better Bluray players these days"...
BTW the ability to resume a blu-ray disc where you left off is NOT a player feature - it depends on the disc (java vs. non-java). |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 823 |
| Posted: | | | | No, they're not. They're Cinavia crippled.
Of course, knowing the DVD Profiler community, I would suspect everyone here is "happy" about it. | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote: No, they're not. They're Cinavia crippled.
Of course, knowing the DVD Profiler community, I would suspect everyone here is "happy" about it. I had no idea what you meant about Cinavia so I had to look it up - it appears that it is mandatory on all Blu-ray players since 2010. If a user finds the new Blu-ray players, even "crippled", perform in a way that increases their enjoyment why shouldn't they be "happy"? |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote: No, they're not. They're Cinavia crippled.
Of course, knowing the DVD Profiler community, I would suspect everyone here is "happy" about it. I wouldn't say I am happy about it, more like indifferent. I have no problem with the film industry protecting its product, and don't understand why anybody would. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,337 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote: No, they're not. They're Cinavia crippled. Could you explain how they are "crippled"? |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote: What do you call "better"?
With many of these plastic cheap players you have to be lucky to get more than a year's lifetime before they break down. In terms of build quality, I wouldn't state they're building "better and better Bluray players these days"...
BTW the ability to resume a blu-ray disc where you left off is NOT a player feature - it depends on the disc (java vs. non-java). What do I call better .. Well I listed a few in my opening thread.,. and these cheap players that may or may not breakl down on a yearly to biyearly basis are far more better than the $1000 I paid for my first dvd player back in 1997 ( Sony S3000 .. That player still works today .. but would I use it on a daily basis ??... Nah !! | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 756 |
| Posted: | | | | Our first DVD player was a Sony. I'm guessing now but it must be 10 years ago. Cost a couple of hundred GBP. Nice build quality, nice picture. Still running.
When we bought the 50" Pioneer, we bought the matching (and top of the range) DVD player. Better picture than the Sony - well, the HDMI helped! Nice build quality and still running. Paid £900 for it, again guessing, but must be around seven years ago.
2/3 years ago we went Bluray with an LG for around £300. What was interesting was that the DVD picture was better than the Pioneer, for about a third of the price. However, build quality was not in the same league as the Sony or the Pioneer. But the real downside was Bluray playback - when it worked it was very good, but every new "blockbuster" required another firmware update, and it never could get through the race scene in Iron Man 2 without freezing. It finally died after 18 months. Was that because it was a "cheapie", or were we just unlucky?
For the replacement of the LG, I decided (with permission, naturally) to spend a bit more in the hope of getting a better quality machine (both in the PQ and the firmware departments) and we now have an Oppo 93 (£650). Again the PQ has got better, and the firmware has never failed to load a BD....although Argo did take several minutes to get to the menu. So we'll see how long this one lasts, I would hope longer than the LG!
So where does that leave us? For sure the PQ has improved over the years, but the improvement from Sony to Pioneer is more likely due to using HDMI, rather than component video. Having said that though, the DVD playback of the LG was better than the Pioneer for much less money - shame that it died so young! The Oppo is just very good; so we'll see..........
I've not made any comments about audio because we've never used the analogue outputs from any player - it's digital all the way from player through to speakers (at least for the all-important front three, the rears and sub are analogue).
I'm curious about the firmware issues though. Why did the LG need a firmware update for nearly every new Blu and still hiccupped from time to time, yet the Oppo gets updated infrequently, but manages to play all my new Blus without any trouble (even Argo, once it had got to the menu screen)? | | | Chris | | | Last edited: by Mole |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 485 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Mole: Quote: ... I'm curious about the firmware issues though. Why did the LG need a firmware update for nearly every new Blu and still hiccupped from time to time, yet the Oppo gets updated infrequently, but manages to play all my new Blus without any trouble (even Argo, once it had got to the menu screen)? If I recall correctly, there are decoding code sequences handed out by the BluRay controlling body. For those handed out, these are encoded in the firmware of the player. As new batches are handed out to manufacturers, a firmware update might be required for your shiny new disc. In my country it happens relatively frequently with discs from some smaller distributors, who apparently only buy a few codes at the time. For me, this happens from time to time on my Playstation 3, but nowadays less frequently than say 3, 4 years ago. A different issue that also requires firmware updates is that media companies (as far as I found Sony HE and Fox are the main 'baddies') are using more elaborate and ever changing startup code. Why beats me, menu's are menu's even when animated and that has been around for years now. Some disks dump a bit on the PS3's hard disk, some ridiculously large amounts of megabytes (Nice thing with a PS3 is, you can review it). Don't count yourself too lucky with Oppo. Besides my old PS3 I have an Oppo 93 and it needed more firmware updates for apparently not-correctly-played-back disks than for new decoding codes. Then again, Oppo is quite frank about the firmware revisions, see their Facebook pages and their service pages. The latter also refer to the Oppo wiki, which is quite informative, and the AVS forum pages about their players, that also mention the firmware releases. Apart from specific Oppo issues, it is generally wise to shut down BD-Live by denying it Internet access and if a known disk starts having large start times or similar quirks, wipe the 'persistent storage' (Oppo) or delete the dumped files (equivalent on the PS3). | | | Eric
If it is important, say it. Otherwise, let silence speak. | | | Last edited: by eommen |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 823 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
| Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | It is amazing. The only difference between a Cinavia Disc and a non Cinavia disc is a watermark encoded into the audio stream.
With newer BD players, it will prevent you from playing ripped Blu-rays in the player (in order to prevent "piracy"). This is no different than any of the other "Disc" encryptions that have been around for dvd's for years.
There is an unfortunate side to this though. Unfortunately the newer versions of PowerDVD and TMT now have the Cinavia codec within the software, and will not allow you to play ripped movies from your computer. (though it has been illegal, in the US, to have the software to bypass any encryption)
If this is what you want to call crippled, then so be it. The suggestion I would have for you, don't upgrade your software or BD players, and you should not have any problems.
But I think I agree with Martian, I personally, don't see it as an issue | | | Last edited: by CharlieM |
| Registered: October 6, 2008 | Posts: 1,932 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Grendell: Quote: Quoting Kulju:
Quote: Quoting Grendell: Could you explain how they are "crippled"?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cinavia+crippled I am curious: what legal activity are you unable to perform with a player crippled so? |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 823 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 823 |
| Posted: | | | | Thank you, DVD Profiler Community, for demonstrating my assumption. | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
| Registered: May 8, 2007 | Posts: 823 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote: This is no different than any of the other "Disc" encryptions that have been around for dvd's for years. It is very different. Please read the Wikipedia article and make an effort to understand it. Quote: There is an unfortunate side to this though. Unfortunately the newer versions of PowerDVD and TMT now have the Cinavia codec within the software, and will not allow you to play ripped movies from your computer. (though it has been illegal, in the US, to have the software to bypass any encryption) PowerDVD and TMT are now patched by AnyDVD to prevent Cinavia detection. | | | 99.9% of all cat plans consist only of "Step 1." |
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|